Key Takeaways
When policy limits are insufficient, recovery options include UM/UIM coverage (mandatory in SC under S.C. Code § 38-77-150, offered in GA under O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11), claims against multiple parties, umbrella policies, employer liability, personal assets, and bad faith claims. Georgia's bad faith statute (O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6) allows penalties up to 50% plus attorney fees.
When a serious accident leaves you with six-figure medical bills and a wrecked vehicle, the at-fault driver’s insurance policy may not come close to covering your losses. Georgia and South Carolina both require only $25,000 per person in bodily injury liability coverage — a number that barely scratches the surface of a traumatic brain injury, a spinal cord injury, or a wrongful death claim. The good news: the at-fault driver’s liability policy is not the ceiling on your recovery. Several legal strategies can push compensation well beyond those limits.
This guide walks through six options for recovering more than the at-fault driver’s policy limits, with specific statute references and practical differences between Georgia and South Carolina law. If you are dealing with a serious injury claim where policy limits are clearly insufficient, contact a car accident lawyer as early as possible — timing matters for several of these strategies.
For a detailed overview of minimum coverage requirements and how they affect injured drivers, the Insurance Information Institute’s auto insurance data page provides current statistics on coverage gaps and underinsured driving rates nationwide.
Understanding Insurance Policy Limits in Georgia and South Carolina
Both Georgia and South Carolina require drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. The minimum amounts are identical on paper, but the way each state handles coverage gaps, stacking rules, and enforcement differs substantially.
| Coverage Requirement | Georgia | South Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Bodily Injury Per Person | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Bodily Injury Per Accident | $50,000 | $50,000 |
| Property Damage Per Accident | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| UM/UIM Required? | Offered; rejection must be in writing | Mandatory unless rejected in writing |
| Estimated Uninsured Rate | ~12% | ~9% |
These minimums — often written as 25/50/25 — were set decades ago and have not kept pace with modern medical costs. A single surgery after a motorcycle accident can exceed $25,000 before the patient leaves the hospital. A catastrophic spinal cord injury can generate lifetime care costs exceeding $2 million. When the at-fault driver carries only minimum coverage, the injured person must look beyond that single policy to recover fair compensation.
Option 1 — Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) Coverage
Your own auto insurance policy is often the most immediate source of additional compensation. Uninsured motorist (UM) coverage applies when the at-fault driver has no insurance at all. Underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage kicks in when the at-fault driver’s policy is insufficient to cover your damages. Both states treat these coverages differently.
Georgia UM/UIM Rules
Under O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11, Georgia insurers must offer UM/UIM coverage equal to the liability limits on every auto policy they issue. The policyholder can reject the coverage or select lower limits, but the rejection must be in writing. If the insurer cannot produce a signed rejection form, the UM/UIM coverage defaults to the full liability limits of the policy.
Georgia also allows stacking of UM/UIM coverage across multiple vehicles on the same policy unless the policyholder has specifically waived stacking in writing. If you insure three vehicles and carry $100,000 in UM/UIM coverage per vehicle, you could potentially access $300,000 in underinsured motorist benefits.
South Carolina UM/UIM Rules
South Carolina takes an even more protective approach. Under S.C. Code § 38-77-150, UM/UIM coverage is mandatory in South Carolina — it must be included in every auto policy unless the named insured rejects it in writing on a specific form approved by the Department of Insurance. Courts in South Carolina strictly interpret rejection forms, and an improperly executed rejection is void, meaning full coverage applies.
South Carolina also permits stacking of UM/UIM benefits under S.C. Code § 38-77-160. Stacking across multiple vehicles on the same policy, or even across policies in the same household, can significantly increase available coverage. This is one of the most powerful tools for victims of pedestrian accidents and bicycle accidents, where the injured person is especially vulnerable to catastrophic harm and the at-fault driver often carries bare-minimum coverage.
Option 2 — Claims Against Multiple At-Fault Parties
Many serious accidents involve more than one negligent party. When multiple defendants share fault, each defendant’s insurance policy becomes a potential source of recovery — and the legal rules governing shared liability differ between Georgia and South Carolina.
Georgia: Modified Joint and Several Liability
Georgia applies a modified form of joint and several liability under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33. Under Georgia’s comparative fault system, a plaintiff can recover only if the plaintiff is less than 50% at fault. Among defendants, Georgia generally applies several liability — each defendant pays only their proportional share of fault. However, if a defendant is found to have acted with specific intent to cause harm, that defendant may be held jointly liable for the entire judgment.
As a practical matter, identifying multiple at-fault parties in Georgia is critical because each defendant’s share of fault is capped at their percentage of responsibility. If two drivers share fault for a wreck that caused your traumatic brain injury, you pursue separate claims against each driver’s policy.
South Carolina: Joint and Several Liability
South Carolina maintains traditional joint and several liability for defendants found liable in a personal injury action. Under South Carolina’s comparative fault rule, a plaintiff can recover if the plaintiff is less than 51% at fault. Any defendant found liable can be held responsible for the entire judgment, regardless of that defendant’s individual percentage of fault. This is a significant advantage for plaintiffs, because it means you can collect the full judgment amount from whichever defendant has the deepest pockets or the largest insurance policy.
This difference matters enormously when one at-fault party has minimal coverage and another has a substantial policy. In South Carolina, you do not have to chase each defendant for their proportional share — you can collect the full amount from any one of them.
Option 3 — Umbrella or Excess Policies
Many drivers and businesses carry umbrella or excess liability policies that sit on top of their primary auto insurance. An umbrella policy typically provides $1 million to $5 million in additional coverage, and it activates once the underlying policy limits are exhausted.
The challenge is that umbrella policies do not appear on a standard insurance disclosure. In Georgia, you can discover additional coverage through formal discovery once a lawsuit is filed. In South Carolina, S.C. Code § 38-77-50 requires insurers to disclose policy limits within 30 days of a written request by the claimant.
Umbrella policies are particularly common with commercial drivers and business owners. If the at-fault driver was operating a company vehicle or was on the job at the time of the crash, the employer’s commercial umbrella policy may provide millions in additional coverage. This is one reason why accidents involving commercial vehicles, including truck accidents, often result in substantially higher recoveries than crashes involving only private passenger vehicles.
Option 4 — Claims Against Employers or Commercial Entities
When the at-fault driver was working at the time of the accident, the employer may be directly liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior — Latin for “let the master answer.” Both Georgia and South Carolina recognize this doctrine, which holds employers responsible for the negligent acts of employees committed within the scope of employment.
This is the primary reason that trucking accident claims frequently result in recoveries far exceeding the individual driver’s policy limits. A solo driver might carry $25,000 in personal coverage, but the trucking company is required by federal law to carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage (and often carries $1 million or more). Commercial motor carriers, delivery companies, rideshare platforms, and construction companies all carry commercial policies that dwarf individual coverage limits.
Beyond respondeat superior, employers can face direct liability for negligent hiring, negligent training, negligent supervision, or negligent entrustment of a vehicle to an unqualified driver. These claims are independent of the employee’s own liability and open up additional coverage pools.
In product-related crashes — defective tires, faulty brakes, airbag failures — the vehicle or component manufacturer may also be liable. Product liability claims against manufacturers and distributors typically involve corporate insurance policies worth tens of millions of dollars.
Option 5 — Personal Assets of the At-Fault Driver
Insurance is not the only source of recovery. If the at-fault driver has personal assets — real estate, investment accounts, business interests — those assets can be reached through a judgment. In practice, pursuing personal assets makes financial sense only when the defendant has substantial wealth, because collection efforts against someone with few assets produce little return relative to the cost of litigation.
Georgia and South Carolina both have homestead exemptions that protect a portion of the defendant’s home equity from judgment creditors. In Georgia, the homestead exemption is $21,500 of equity. South Carolina’s homestead exemption is $63,250 for individuals (with a separate exemption for heads of household). These exemptions protect the defendant’s primary residence up to the stated amount, but any equity above the exemption is fair game.
A lawyer pursuing a claim beyond policy limits will typically conduct an asset investigation early in the case. If the defendant has attachable assets, this changes the settlement dynamics — the defendant has personal skin in the game and is more motivated to settle rather than risk a judgment that could wipe out their savings or force a property sale. Cases involving wrongful death or permanent disability often justify the additional effort and expense of pursuing personal assets because the damages are so substantial.
Option 6 — Bad Faith Claims Against the Insurer
When an insurance company unreasonably refuses to settle a claim within policy limits, it may be liable for bad faith — and bad faith damages can far exceed the original policy limits. This is one of the most powerful tools for recovering beyond policy limits, but the rules differ significantly between Georgia and South Carolina.
Georgia Bad Faith
Under O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6, if an insurer refuses to pay a covered claim within 60 days of a demand and the refusal is in bad faith, the insurer is liable for a penalty of up to 50% of the claim amount plus reasonable attorney’s fees. Georgia courts have interpreted this statute to apply when an insurer unreasonably delays or denies a claim without a good faith basis for doing so.
Additionally, Georgia recognizes a common-law bad faith cause of action against the at-fault driver’s own insurer. When a liability insurer fails to settle within policy limits despite having a clear opportunity to do so, and the insured is subsequently hit with an excess judgment, the insurer may be liable for the full amount of the judgment — even the portion exceeding policy limits. This creates enormous leverage in negotiations.
South Carolina Bad Faith
South Carolina addresses insurer bad faith under S.C. Code § 38-59-20, which prohibits unfair claim settlement practices. South Carolina also recognizes a common-law cause of action for bad faith refusal to pay benefits. Under South Carolina law, an insured can recover actual damages, consequential damages, and punitive damages when an insurer acts in bad faith.
South Carolina courts have held that a liability insurer has a duty to act in good faith when evaluating settlement offers within policy limits. If the insurer unreasonably rejects a within-limits settlement demand and the insured faces an excess verdict, the insurer can be held responsible for the full judgment amount. Punitive damages in South Carolina bad faith cases can be substantial, depending on the egregiousness of the insurer’s conduct.
Georgia vs. South Carolina Comparison Table
The table below summarizes the key differences between the two states on issues that directly affect your ability to recover beyond the at-fault driver’s policy limits.
| Issue | Georgia | South Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Liability Limits | 25/50/25 | 25/50/25 |
| UM/UIM Coverage | Must be offered; written rejection required (O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11) | Mandatory unless rejected in writing on approved form (S.C. Code § 38-77-150) |
| UM/UIM Stacking | Permitted unless waived in writing | Permitted; broadly interpreted by courts (S.C. Code § 38-77-160) |
| Comparative Fault Threshold | Plaintiff must be less than 50% at fault (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33) | Plaintiff must be less than 51% at fault |
| Joint and Several Liability | Generally several liability only; each defendant pays proportional share | Full joint and several liability; any defendant can pay the entire judgment |
| Bad Faith Statute | O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6 — up to 50% penalty plus attorney’s fees | S.C. Code § 38-59-20 — actual, consequential, and punitive damages |
| Policy Limit Disclosure | Available through litigation discovery | Insurer must disclose within 30 days of written request (S.C. Code § 38-77-50) |
| Statute of Limitations | 2 years (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33) | 3 years (S.C. Code § 15-3-530) |
How a Lawyer Maximizes Recovery Beyond Policy Limits
Recovering beyond policy limits requires a fundamentally different approach than a standard insurance claim. An experienced personal injury attorney adds value at every stage of this process.
Early coverage investigation. Before filing suit, your attorney sends preservation letters and coverage disclosure requests to identify every available policy — the at-fault driver’s liability coverage, any umbrella or excess policies, employer or commercial policies, and your own UM/UIM coverage. In South Carolina, the statutory disclosure requirement under S.C. Code § 38-77-50 makes this process faster, but in both states, a thorough investigation often uncovers coverage the injured person never knew existed.
Identifying all liable parties. Your attorney examines the facts to determine whether anyone besides the at-fault driver bears responsibility. Was the driver working? Was a vehicle defective? Was a road hazard caused by a government entity’s negligence? Was a bar or restaurant liable under dram shop laws for serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated driver? Each additional defendant opens a new insurance policy and increases the total available recovery.
Strategic demand sequencing. When multiple coverage sources exist, the order in which demands are made and settlements are negotiated can significantly affect the total recovery. For example, settling with the at-fault driver’s insurer for the full policy limits before pursuing UIM coverage preserves the full UIM claim. Settling in the wrong order can create offsets or credits that reduce the overall recovery.
Bad faith positioning. When a liability insurer is dragging its feet, your attorney can structure a time-limited policy-limits demand that creates bad faith exposure for the insurer. If the insurer fails to accept the demand within the specified timeframe, it risks excess liability — and insurers know this. The threat of bad faith exposure is often enough to push a reluctant insurer to tender its full policy limits.
Litigation readiness. Insurance companies pay more when they believe the plaintiff is genuinely prepared to go to trial. Filing suit, conducting aggressive discovery, retaining strong expert witnesses, and preparing for trial all signal that the plaintiff will not accept a lowball offer. This is especially true in cases involving catastrophic injuries — traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and wrongful death claims — where the potential verdict at trial could be many multiples of the available policy limits.
Contact Roden Law — We Fight for Full Compensation
If your damages exceed the at-fault driver’s insurance policy limits, you need a law firm that knows how to find every dollar of available coverage and build a case that maximizes your total recovery. Roden Law has recovered more than $250 million for injured clients across Georgia and South Carolina, and we have extensive experience handling claims that push well beyond policy limits — including cases involving commercial truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, and other catastrophic injury claims.
We work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing unless we win. Call 1-844-RESULTS or contact any of our five offices in Savannah, Darien, Charleston, Columbia, or Myrtle Beach for a free case evaluation. The statute of limitations in Georgia is just two years under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33, and three years in South Carolina under S.C. Code § 15-3-530 — do not wait until time runs out to explore your options.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Author
