What Is a Medical Malpractice Case?

Did your doctor fail to inform you of the risks before a procedure in Georgia or South Carolina? Our medical malpractice lawyers pursue informed consent claims when patients are not given the information needed to make treatment decisions.

— Reviewed by Eric Roden, Founding Partner, CEO at Roden Law

Key Takeaways

If you were injured in a medical malpractice in Georgia or South Carolina, the deadline to file a lawsuit is 2 years from the date of injury in Georgia (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33) and 3 years in South Carolina (S.C. Code § 15-3-545). Both states follow a modified comparative negligence rule: Georgia lets you recover if you are less than 50% at fault (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33), and South Carolina if you are less than 51% at fault (Nelson v. Concrete Supply Co., 303 S.C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991)), with your award reduced by your percentage of fault either way. Roden Law represents injury victims in Georgia and South Carolina on a contingency fee: the consultation is free and there is no fee unless we win.

Informed Consent Claims in Georgia & South Carolina

Every patient has the legal right to make informed decisions about their medical care. Before performing a surgery, procedure, or treatment, a doctor must explain the nature of the proposed treatment, its material risks and potential complications, alternative treatment options, and the risks of foregoing treatment entirely. When a doctor fails to provide this information and the patient suffers harm from a risk they were not warned about, the patient may have an informed consent claim — a specific type of medical malpractice.

At Roden Law, our informed consent lawyers represent patients across Georgia and South Carolina who were not given the information they needed to make meaningful decisions about their medical care. These cases arise when patients suffer complications they would have avoided had they been properly informed of the risks and alternatives.

Georgia Informed Consent Law

Georgia’s informed consent requirements are established through case law and statute. Under Georgia law, a doctor must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient would want to know in making a treatment decision. Georgia uses the “professional” standard — meaning the disclosure required is measured by what a reasonable medical practitioner in the same specialty would have disclosed under similar circumstances.

Georgia’s medical malpractice framework applies to informed consent claims, including the expert affidavit requirement under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 and the 5-year statute of repose under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71.

South Carolina Informed Consent Law

South Carolina addresses informed consent through its medical malpractice statute. Under S.C. Code § 15-79-125, informed consent claims are subject to the same Notice of Intent and expert opinion requirements as other medical malpractice actions. South Carolina courts measure the disclosure a doctor owed by what a reasonable medical practitioner of like training would have disclosed under the same or similar circumstances (Hook v. Rothstein, 281 S.C. 541, 316 S.E.2d 690 (Ct. App. 1984)).

Common Informed Consent Failures

Informed consent failures can occur in many medical contexts:

  • Failure to disclose known risks of a surgical procedure, such as nerve damage, paralysis, or infection
  • Not informing patients of less invasive alternative treatments
  • Failing to explain the risks of a medication, including serious side effects and drug interactions
  • Performing a different or more extensive procedure than what the patient consented to
  • Not disclosing the surgeon’s lack of experience with a particular procedure
  • Obtaining consent when the patient was under sedation, in pain, or otherwise unable to give meaningful consent
  • Failing to use a qualified interpreter for non-English-speaking patients

Informed consent failures often accompany other forms of malpractice. If your doctor performed a procedure you did not fully consent to and a surgical error occurred, you may have claims for both informed consent failure and surgical negligence. When informed consent failures involve anesthesia, the anesthesiologist’s separate duty to obtain consent for the anesthesia plan may also apply.

Proving an Informed Consent Claim

To succeed in an informed consent case, you must prove three elements:

  • Failure to disclose: The doctor did not adequately inform you of a material risk, complication, or alternative treatment
  • Causation: Had you been properly informed, you would not have consented to the procedure
  • Harm: You suffered injury from the undisclosed risk

The causation element often centers on what a “reasonable patient” would have decided if properly informed. Courts consider whether the undisclosed risk was significant enough that a reasonable person would have reconsidered the treatment.

Damages in Informed Consent Cases

Patients who prove informed consent violations may recover compensation for all injuries and complications resulting from the procedure, additional medical treatment required, lost wages during recovery, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of bodily function or autonomy. In cases where an informed consent failure leads to catastrophic injury or death, our wrongful death lawyers are available to assist. Contact Roden Law for a free consultation.

Free Case Review — No Fees Unless We Win Available 24/7 · Georgia & South Carolina
844-RESULTS

What to Do After Suspected Medical Malpractice

  1. Request your complete medical records in writing. From every provider and facility involved, not just the one you suspect. Ask for the full file including imaging, nursing notes, and orders. In a malpractice case the records largely are the case.
  2. Keep getting treatment — ideally from someone new. Your health comes first, and a second opinion may catch something correctable. A gap in treatment is also one of the first things a defense expert points to when arguing an injury was not serious.
  3. Write down what happened while you still remember it. Dates, who you saw, what you were told before and after, and who else was in the room. The written record is authored entirely by the other side; your account is not.
  4. Do not accept waived bills or a free corrective procedure in exchange for signing. It is a common offer. It is also sometimes paired with paperwork that ends your claim. Read what is attached, and have it reviewed before you sign it.
  5. Be careful with risk management and insurance adjusters. Those calls are documented and they are not made for your benefit. You are not required to give a recorded statement before speaking with an attorney.
  6. Do not assume a bad outcome is — or is not — malpractice. Medicine carries known risks, and a poor result on its own proves nothing. The question is whether the care fell below the accepted standard, and usually only a qualified medical expert can answer it.
  7. Contact an attorney early — the pre-suit requirements are slow. Georgia requires an expert affidavit filed with the complaint (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1), and South Carolina requires a Notice of Intent to File Suit with an expert affidavit followed by mandatory mediation (S.C. Code §§ 15-79-125, 15-36-100). Locating the right expert and obtaining that opinion routinely takes months, and Georgia's deadline is two years. Roden Law offers free consultations.

The Rules That Apply

  • In Georgia, you have 2 years from the date of injury (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33).
  • In South Carolina, you have 3 years (S.C. Code § 15-3-545).
  • Georgia — Modified Comparative Fault: You can recover if less than 50% at fault (O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33). Your award is reduced by your fault percentage.
  • South Carolina — Modified Comparative Fault: You can recover if less than 51% at fault. Your award is reduced by your fault percentage.

How negligence, compensation, deadlines and fault work: Medical Malpractice Lawyers →

Free Case Review — No Fees Unless We Win Available 24/7 · Georgia & South Carolina
844-RESULTS

Recent Case Results

Results shown are gross settlement/verdict amounts before fees and costs. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

About the Author

Eric Roden, Founding Partner, CEO at Roden Law

Eric Roden

Founding Partner, CEO State Bar of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals Supreme Court of Georgia

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Our Failure to Obtain Informed Consent Lawyers Today

If you were injured and believe another party is at fault, contact us for a free, no-obligation review. We dedicate our skills and resources to recovering the maximum compensation you deserve — at no upfront cost.